Stapled versus hand-sewn: A prospective emergency surgery study. An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional study.

BACKGROUND: Data from the trauma patient population suggests handsewn (HS) anastomoses are superior to stapled (ST). A recent retrospective study in emergency general surgery (EGS) patients had similar findings. The aim of the current study was to evaluate HS and ST anastomoses in EGS patients undergoing urgent/emergent operations. METHODS: The study was sponsored by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Studies Committee. Patients undergoing urgent/emergent bowel resection for EGS pathology were prospectively enrolled from July 22, 2013 to December 31, 2015. Patients were grouped by HS/ST anastomoses, and variables were collected. The primary outcome was anastomotic failure. Similar to other studies, anastomotic failure was evaluated at the anastomosis level. Multivariable logistic regression was performed controlling for age and risk factors for anastomotic failure. RESULTS: Fifteen institutions enrolled a total of 595 patients with 649 anastomoses (253 HS and 396 ST). Mean age was 61 years, 51% were men, 7% overall mortality. Age and sex were the same between groups. The overall anastomotic failure rate was 12.5%. The HS group had higher lactate, lower albumin, and were more likely to be on vasopressors. Hospital and intensive care unit days, as well as mortality, were greater in the HS group. Anastomotic failure rates and operative time were equivalent for HS and ST. On multivariate regression, the presence of contamination at initial resection (odds ratio, 1.965; 95% confidence interval, 1.183-3.264) and the patient being managed with open abdomen (odds ratio, 2.529; 95% confidence interval, 1.492-4.286) were independently associated with anastomotic failure, while the type of anastomosis was not. CONCLUSION: EGS patients requiring bowel resection and anastomosis are at high risk for anastomotic failure. The current study illustrates an apparent bias among acute care surgeons to perform HS techniques in higher-risk patients. Despite the individualized application of technique for differing patient populations, the risk of anastomotic failure was equivalent when comparing HS and ST anastomoses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, level II.

Acute care surgery and emergency general surgery: Addition by subtraction.

INTRODUCTION: The formation of Acute Care Surgery services leads to decreased time to treatment and improved outcomes for emergency general surgery (EGS) patients. However, minimal work has focused on the ideal care delivery system and team structure. We hypothesize that the implementation of a dedicated EGS team (separate from trauma and surgical critical care), with EGS-specific protocols and dedicated operating room (OR) time, will increase productivity and improve mortality. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of financial and EGS registry data from fiscal year (FY) 12 to FY15. Data are from an academic, university-based EGS team composed of two acute care surgery attending surgeons, advanced practitioners (APs), residents, and a fellow. In FY12, processes were implemented to standardize paging of consults, patient sign-out with attending surgeons' and APs' participation, clinical/billing protocols, OR availability, and quality improvement. Outcomes included relative value units (RVUs), surgical case volume, charges/payments, and number of patient encounters. The secondary outcome was mortality. The χ test was used to compare mortality, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Total patient encounters increased from 6,723 in FY 12 to 9,238 in FY 15 (+37%). Relative value units increased from 18,422 in FY 12 to 25,314 in FY 15 (+37%). Charges increased by 76% and payments increased by 60% from FY 12 to FY 15. Charges per encounter increased from $461 in FY 12 to $591 in FY 15 (+28%) Additionally, both inpatient and surgical case loads increased. Mortality remained stable throughout the study period (FY 12, 4.5%; FY 13, 5.2%; FY 14, 5.3%; FY 15, 3.2%: p = 0.177). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of dedicated OR time, defined EGS team structure, practice protocols, and active attending surgeons'/APs' participation was temporally related to increased case volume, patients seen, and revenue, while mortality remained unchanged. Further study is necessary to establish the translatability of these data to other systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision, level III.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening guidelines: what are we willing to miss?

BACKGROUND: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is reported to occur in approximately 2% of blunt trauma patients, with a stroke rate of up to 20%. Guidelines for BCVI screening are based on clinical and radiographic findings. We hypothesized that liberal screening of the neck vasculature, as part of initial computed tomographic (CT) imaging in blunt trauma patients with significant mechanisms of injury, identifies BCVI that may go undetected. METHODS: As per protocol, patients at risk for significant injuries undergo a noncontrast head CT scan followed by a multislice CT scan (40-slice or 64-slice) incorporating an intravenous contrast-enhanced pass from the circle of Willis through the pelvis (whole-body CT [WBCT] scan). The trauma registry was retrospectively reviewed, and all patients with BCVI from 2009 to 2012 were analyzed. Patients undergoing WBCT scan were then identified, and records were reviewed for BCVI indicators (skull base fracture, cervical spine injury, displaced facial fracture, mandible fracture, Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 8, flexion mechanism, hard signs of neck vascular injury, or focal neurologic deficit). RESULTS: Of 16,026 patients evaluated during the study period, 256 (1.6%) were diagnosed with BCVI. The population consisted of 185 patients with suspected BCVI after WBCT scan. One hundred twenty-nine patients (70%) had at least one indicator for BCVI screening, while 56 (30%) had no radiographic or clinical risk factors; 48 of the 56 patients underwent confirmatory CT angiography of the neck within 71 hours of initial WBCT scan, with 35 patients having 45 injuries. CONCLUSION: More liberalized screening for BCVI during initial CT imaging in trauma patients clinically judged to have sufficient mechanism is warranted. Using current BCVI screening guidelines leads to missed BCVI and risk of stroke. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level III.